steadyaku47

Loading...

Saturday, 23 July 2016

Ajaib Tapi Benar : Only in Malaysia!

Some things are just funny

Inundated with all the latest news/articles in Malaysia and on Malaysia, I find some things are just hilarious.

1. Funny that US AG says money belonging to the Malaysia people has been stolen but the Malaysian government does not seem interested to follow up on it.

2. Funny that US AG says money stolen from 1MDB but nobody in 1MDB or the Malaysian government seem interested to find the thief!

3. Funny that I thought 'stealing', 'robbing' and 'defrauding' on such a big scale are all criminal in nature but civil suits are filed instead.

4. Funny that US AG thinks they have the evidence but Malaysia AG still cannot find the evidence.

5. Funny that Malaysians were given the impression in the past that Najib is number '1' but now suddenly his cronies say he is not the 'Malaysian official 1' referred to by the US AG.

6. Funny that some people say that in Malaysia the 1MDB probe is still on-going and in the 2nd phase when I thought the AG and PAC say that "It is done (completed)".

Finally, with the recent MOU signed between Malaysia and Singapore for the HSR, it is funny that some people did not know it refers to the 'high speed rail' project. Instead they think that it is a new 'high speed robbery' project.

PS: You are free to add your 'Funny' observations.

steadyaku47 comment : Again from my Whatsapp chat....sharing.

SOAL-JAWAB ISU 1MDB UNTUK PANDUAN PAKCIK-PAKCIK DI KAMPUNG

steadyaku47 comment : Author unknown - posted on my Whatsapp Chat. Sharing with Pakcik Pakcik di Kampung. You busybodies not in the Kampung can read lah if you want to...no worries...just don't let the Pakcik Pakcik know....nanti upset pulak. Malaysia Boleh!



1. AMERIKA NAK RAMPAS HARTA 1MDB NI. INI SATU CAMPURTANGAN ASING!

Macam ni pakcik. Pakcik ada dengar Amerika nak rampas tanah 1MDB di airport TUDM Sg. Besi? Tanah 1MDB di Jalan Tun Razak? Ada Amerika nak rampas tanah-tanah milik 1MDB di Malaysia? Tiada kan? Amerika hanya nak rampas harta hasil pendapatan filem Hollywood bertajuk "The Wolf of Wall Street". Sebab itulah dalam kertas pendakwaan, defendan atau pihak yang disaman ialah “The Wolf of Wall Street” Motion Picture. Filem ini dikatakan dibuat hasil daripada penggubahan wang haram yang melalui institusi-institusi kewangan di Amerika. Harta hasil pendapatan filem ini juga dimiliki oleh sebuah syarikat yang didaftarkan di Amerika sana, bukan di Malaysia. Ada 17 harta yang disenaraikan, termasuklah hotel di Beverly Hills. Beverly Hills ini kawasan tempat tinggal pelakon dan penyanyi pakcik. Di Amerika sana, pelakon & penyanyi kaya-kaya, bukan macam di sini. Ada juga jet peribadi. Kalau kita dapat jet ini karang, kita trylah naik ramai-ramai untuk pergi haji. Lagipun, yang mula-mula menyiasat benda ini bukannya orang Amerika pakcik, tapi orang Melayu kita juga. Pakcik ingat tak Timbalan Pendakwa Raya SPRM yang ditahan? Melayu dia tu. Timbalan Pengarah Cawangan Khas Polis yang ditukar? Melayu. Peguam Negara yang ditamatkan perkhidmatan atas sebab 'kesihatan', Melayu. Pengarah Bahagian Operasi Khas SPRM yang ditukar, Melayu. Pengarah Komunikasi Strategik Khas SPRM yang ditukar, Melayu. Ketua Pesuruhjaya SPRM yang disuruh 'bercuti', Melayu. Pegawai SPRM yang solat hajat beramai-ramai pun, Melayu semuanya pakcik. Siapa tahu mungkin ini sebenarnya campurtangan kuasa Allah Taala hasil daripada solat hajat mereka?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. HABIS TU APA KENA-MENGENA FILEM 'WOLF' INI DENGAN 1MDB?

Filem 'Wolf' ini, dibuat oleh syarikat milik anak tiri PM kita, nama dia Riza Aziz. Tahun 2012, syarikat si Riza ini dapat duit daripada 1MDB sebanyak USD238 juta, iaitu kira-kira RM741.6 juta pakcik.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. DAH TU BIARLAH 1MDB NAK BAGI BERAPA BANYAK PUN. DUIT SYARIKAT, SYARIKAT PUNYA SUKALAH.

Masalahnya pakcik, 1MDB telah mengisytiharkan kepada umum, bahawa ia tidak memiliki apa-apa kepentingan atau pelaburan terhadap syarikat Riza Aziz. Jadi kalau tiada apa-apa kepentingan, buat apa pula nak bagi RM741.6 juta, kan pakcik?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

4. MACAMANA KAU TAHU SI RIZA NI DAPAT DUIT TU. PANDAI-PANDAI SAJA KAU FITNAH BUDAK TU.

Sebab si Riza ini, dia simpan duit dalam bank, pakcik. Dia tak simpan duit bawah tilam. Jadi, bank ada rekod duit-duit itu masuk ke akaun syarikat dia sebanyak 3 kali:

18 Jun 2012: USD133 juta (RM419.9 juta)
23 Okt 2012: USD60 juta (RM183.5 juta)
14 Nov 2012: USD45 juta (RM138.2 juta)
JUMLAH: USD238 juta (RM741.6 juta)

Duit-duit ini pula, dipindahkan daripada akaun bank Switzerland, ke akaun bank Singapura. Jadi negara Switzerland simpan rekod, negara Singapura pun simpan rekod.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

5. 700 JUTA PULA. DULU BUKANKAH DAH TERBUKTI DUIT TU DERMA, APA NAMA TU, YANG 2.6 BILION TU?

Memang betul pakcik, SPRM sendiri telah menyatakan pada Ogos 2015, bahawa hasil siasatan mereka mengenai duit RM2.6 bilion itu ialah: duit itu duit derma. Kemudian, keluar pula video Menteri Luar Arab Saudi, Adel al-Jubeir, yang orang kata mengesahkan bahawa derma itu datang daripada keluarga diraja Arab Saudi. 'Orang kata'. Cuba pakcik dengar balik video itu. Menteri Arab ini kata:

WARTAWAN:
"Tuan. Uh, adakah anda maklum tentang latarbelakang , mengenai sumbangan kepada Perdana Menteri Malaysia?" 
("Your Excellency. Uh, are you aware of the background of , upon the donation to the Prime Minister of Malaysia?")

MENTERI LUAR ARAB SAUDI:
"Kami sedia maklum tentang, tentang sumbangan tersebut. Dan ia adalah sumbangan yang ikhlas, dengan uh, tiada apa diharapkan sebagai balasan. Uh, kami juga sedia maklum bahawa Peguam Negara Malaysia telah menyiasat perkara ini dengan teliti dan tidak menemui sebarang kesalahan jadi bagi kami perkara ini telah ditutup."
("We are aware of the, the donation. And it is a genuine donation, with uh, nothing expected in return. Uh, we are also fully aware that the Attorney-General of Malaysia has thoroughly investigated the matter and found no wrongdoing so as far as we're concerned this matter was closed.")

Saya nak tanya pakcik: dalam kenyataan Menteri Arab ini, ada tak dia sebut jumlah sumbangan, dan ada tak dia kata bahawa sumbangan itu datangnya daripada keluarga diraja Arab Saudi? Sebab dalam kertas pendakwaan Amerika, Amerika kata duit RM2.6 bilion itu dipindahkan daripada akaun milik Eric Tan Kim Loong, bukan milik keluarga diraja Arab Saudi. Pakcik juga kena ingat: duit RM2.6 bilion itu, bukan duit yang masuk ke akaun si Riza ya? Duit RM2.6 bilion itu ialah duit yang dimasukkan ke dalam akaun orang lain, iaitu 'Malaysian Official 1'. Memang ada orang-orang upahan yang berhempas pulas mahu seluruh rakyat Malaysia menumpukan perhatian kepada isu sumbangan RM2.6 bilion, supaya mereka lupa berbilion-bilion ringgit yang lain, contohnya:

A. Pinjaman Palsu USD700 Juta Oleh PetroSaudi Holdings

USD700 juta ini bukannya kes 'sumbangan' RM2.6 bilion, ya pakcik? USD700 juta ini bersamaan dengan RM2.4 bilion pada tarikh duit itu dipindahkan. Ceritanya macam ni: PetroSaudi Holdings ini, sekali dengar ada bunyi 'Petro' di hadapan, ada nama 'Saudi' di belakang, terus orang anggap "Ini 'Petronas' bagi Arab Saudi agaknya, syarikat minyak nasional Arab Saudi". Salah tu pakcik. Syarikat minyak nasional bagi kerajaan Arab Saudi ialah Saudi Aramco. PetroSaudi Holdings ini hanya sekadar syarikat persendirian sahaja, baru-baru ditubuhkan pula tu. Syarikat ini ditubuhkan bisnesman bernama Tarek Obaid, dan ada kaitan dengan Turki bin Abdullah, anak kepada almarhum Raja Abdullah, raja Arab Saudi yang baru meninggal tahun lepas. Adakah bila berurusan dengan syarikat yang 'ada kaitan' dengan anak raja, maka ia bermakna berurusan dengan kerajaan? Pakcik kena faham: almarhum Raja Abdullah ada 19 orang anak. Yang menggantikan almarhum jadi raja pula bukan anak beliau, tapi adik tiri beliau. Jadi faham-faham sahajalah kedudukan anak-anak almarhum, tak banyak manapun pengaruh mereka ke atas keputusan kerajaan Arab Saudi.

PetroSaudi Holdings ini dikatakan telah bagi pinjaman sebanyak USD700 juta kepada syarikat usahasama 1MDB-PetroSaudi Limited. Masalahnya, PetroSaudi Holdings tak pernah pun bagi duit tu, tapi 1MDB-PetroSaudi Limited diminta untuk bayar balik. Macam ada Ah Long datang minta hutang daripada pakcik, tapi pakcik tak pernah pinjam pun daripada Ah Long tu. Tapi sebab pakcik dah tua dan pelupa, pakcik pun bayarlah sahaja. Lebih malang lagi, bila pakcik bayar, pakcik tak pula bayar terus kepada si Ah Long tu. Tapi pakcik bagi pula duit itu kepada Ah Pek, anak si Ah Long. Si Ah Pek kemudiannya bawa duit itu untuk berjoli. Samalah macam 1MDB-PetroSaudi Limited ini. Dia sebenarnya tak berhutang, tapi dia bayar juga. Bila bayar, dia tak bayar terus kepada PetroSaudi Holdings, tapi kepada Good Star Limited, syarikat lain milik seseorang bernama Jho Low. Ini namanya bangang bertimpa-timpa ni pakcik. Daripada USD700 juta ini, Amerika ada rekod bahawa sejumlah USD20 juta telah dimasukkan ke akaun 'Malaysian Official 1':

23 Feb 2011: USD10 juta (RM30.5 juta)
13 Jun 2011: USD10 juta (RM30.3 juta)
JUMLAH: USD20 juta (RM60.8 juta)

Peguam Negara sendiri menyatakan bahawa akaun ini milik 'Malaysian Official 1'. Bukan saya yang kata, pakcik.

BUKTI DIPERLUKAN:
a. Dokumen/rekod kiriman wang Deutsche Bank (Malaysia) Berhad bertarikh 30 September 2009 sebanyak USD700 juta kepada akaun milik Good Star (Seychelles) Limited bernombor 11116073 di RBS Coutts Bank Limited (kini Coutts & Co. Limited).
b. Dokumen/rekod bayaran fi broker kepada akaun bernombor 7573800 di J. P. Morgan (Suisse) SA.

STATUS SIASATAN: Tiada maklumat siasatan.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Penjualan Harta Bukan Milik Sendiri Oleh PetroSaudi Holdings

PetroSaudi Holdings dituduh menjual harta yang bukan miliknya kepada 1MDB-PetroSaudi Limited. Harta berkenaan sebenarnya dimiliki oleh syarikat lain, iaitu Buried Hill Energy. Ceritanya macam ini pakcik. Pakcik nak beli satu bidang tanah daripada Ah Long. Pakcik pun bayar duit kepada Ah Long. Bila pakcik pergi ke pejabat tanah, pegawai bagitau pakcik, tanah itu sebenarnya bukan Ah Long yang punya. Jadi pakcik pun terpinga-pinga: duit dah habis, tanah tak dapat.

BUKTI DIPERLUKAN:
a. Dokumen perjanjian usahasama 1MDB-PetroSaudi Limited bertarikh 28 September 2009.
b. Dokumen perjanjian pembelian aset oleh PetroSaudi Holdings bertarikh 4 Julai 2009.
c. Rekod pembatalan perjanjian pembelian aset oleh PetroSaudi Holdings bertarikh 23 November 2009.

STATUS SIASATAN: Tiada maklumat siasatan.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Pecah Amanah RM42 Juta Ke Akaun Peribadi

Ini lagi satu duit yang tidak termasuk dalam kes 'sumbangan' RM2.6 bilion, tapi rakyat 'lupa' nak tanyakan. Bila rakyat 'lupa', jawabnya senyap sajalah. Duit sebanyak RM42 juta daripada SRC International Sdn. Bhd. (kini anak syarikat Kementerian Kewangan Malaysia) telah didakwa dilupuskan ke dalam sebuah akaun peribadi. Ini benda paling senang nak terangkan kepada pakcik. Macam pakcik kerja di pejabat, pakcik nampak duit majikan, pakcik ambil duit tu, masuk poket pakcik. Senang nak faham, kan?

BUKTI DIPERLUKAN:
a. Borang permohonan kiriman wang Affin Bank Berhad bertarikh 26 Disember 2014 sebanyak RM5 juta kepada akaun bernombor 2112022011880 di AmIslamic Bank Berhad.
b. Borang permohonan kiriman wang Affin Bank Berhad bertarikh 26 Disember 2014 sebanyak RM27 juta kepada akaun bernombor 2112022011880 di AmIslamic Bank Berhad.
c. Borang permohonan kiriman wang Affin Bank Berhad bertarikh 10 Februari 2015 sebanyak RM10 juta kepada akaun bernombor 2112022011880 di AmIslamic Bank Berhad.

STATUS SIASATAN: Siasatan “masih berjalan oleh SPRM.”

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

6. OKLAH. PAKCIK ADA SOALAN LAST NI. SIAPA DIA 'MALAYSIAN OFFICIAL 1'?

Ok pakcik, kertas pendakwaan Amerika kata 'Malaysian Official 1' ini ialah:
i. Pegawai berjawatan tinggi dalam kerajaan Malaysia;
ii. Berjawatan tinggi dalam 1MDB. Berkuasa melantik dan menyingkir ahli Lembaga Pengarah 1MDB. Sebarang komitmen kewangan 1MDB memerlukan kelulusan beliau;
iii. Ahli keluarga kepada Riza Aziz.

PM pun sudah berjanji "kita akan beri kerjasama yang sepenuhnya dengan semua badan siasatan peringkat antarabangsa". Jadi kita sama-sama nantikan kerjasama itu, ok pakcik? Ngam.

KOMEN BALAS TERHADAP KENYATAAN TS MUHYIDDIN YASSIN MENGENAI TINDAKAN DOJ USA.


Mohd Puad Zarkashi
MT UMNO.

Saya sengaja mengambil sedikit masa sebelum membuat kenyataan kerana mahu melihat kenyataan Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin terlebih dahulu dan melihat apakah lagi pembohongan yang ingin beliau lakukan. Sebelum ini, terbukti beberapa kenyataan beliau berkaitan 1MDB bukan sahaja ternyata dangkal tetapi sarat dengan pembohongan. Kenyataan terbaru beliau berkaitan Jabatan Kehakiman AS menunjukkan bahawa beliau tidak memahami proses undang-undang yang sedang berlaku dan masih mahu membohongi rakyat.

Pertamanya, Muhyiddin berbohong apabila menuduh Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Razak tidak mengambil serius mengenai kenyataan Jabatan Kehakiman AS ini. Jelas Perdana Menteri, dalam kenyataan telah menegaskan bahawa kerajaan Malaysia memandang serius dakwaan Jabatan Kehakiman AS ini dan akan memberikan kerjasama penuh jika diminta. Bagaimanapun, pendirian Malaysia adalah jelas, bahawa proses undang-undang mesti dihormati. Biarlah tindakan saman sivil ini melalui proses yang sepatutnya dan setiap pihak yang dinamakan wajar diberi peluang membela diri dalam perbicaraan yang adil sebelum sebarang kesimpulan dibuat.

Kedua, Muhyiddin juga berbohong apabila mendakwa bahawa tindakan saman sivil ini adalah "bukti penipuan pihak yang dinamakan dan mereka mencuri duit 1MDB." Muhyiddin gagal memahami kenapa Jabatan Kehakiman AS tidak mendakwa semua penama yang terbabit dan merampas setiap aset yang disenaraikan, sebaliknya hanya membuat saman sivil. Sebenarnya perkara ini telah diulas oleh ramai pengamal undang-undang dan mereka menjelaskan bahawa antara sebab utama kenapa Jabatan Kehakiman AS tidak membuat pendakwaan dan merampas aset-aset ini adalah kerana ia tidak mempunyai bukti kukuh. Kes ini juga sedikit pelik kerana tindakan dibuat bersandarkan aduan Sarawak Report dan individu tertentu tentang kecurian. Bagaimanapun sejak hari pertama lagi, pihak yang didakwa menjadi mangsa kecurian ini, iaitu 1MDB telah menafikan bahawa wang mereka telah dicuri dan mereka telah membuktikannya dengan dokuken-dokumen berkaitan dan penyata kewangan diaudit. Muhyiddin mendakwa terdapat kehilangan berbilion ringgit dari 1MDB sedangkan pada waktu yang sama 1MDB berulang kali menyatakan bahawa tiada bukti wang dalam kawalannya yang hilang. Jika ada pertikaian sekalipun, ia hanya melibatkan wang yang berada di dalam kawalan syarikat IPIC dan Aabar PJS dari Abu Dhabi yang kini menjadi kes arbitrari.

Ketiga, Muhyiddin mendakwa apa yang terkandung dalam laporan Jabatan Kehakiman adalah "penemuan pasukan penyiasat AS", sedangkan ia bukan penemuan sebaliknya hanya syak wasangka berdasarkan aduan yang dilaporkan kepada mereka. Atas sebab itu sehingga kini Jabatan Kehakiman AS tidak mampu untuk membuat pendakwaan menggunakan prosiding jenayah biasa dan tiada sebarang pihak dalam kalangan penama yang didakwa.

Keempat, pelik apabila Muhyiddin mahu kerajaan Malaysia mengambil tindakan segera mengikut undang-undang Malaysia ke atas MALAYSIAN OFFICIAL 1, Reza Aziz, Jho Lo dan nama-nama lain yang disenaraikan dalam laporan Peguam Negara AS hanya berdasarkan kenyataan Jabatan Kehakiman AS. Soalan yang perlu ditanya kepada Muhyiddin adalah apakah asas untuk kerajaan mengambil tindakan? Jabatan Kehakiman AS sendiri belum benar-benar pasti mengenai dakwaan mereka kerana tidak mempunyai bukti yang kukuh. Dalam saman sivil ini tiada penama-penama yang didakwa atas kesalahan jenayah. Bagaimanakah Muhyiddin pula mahu kerajaan Malaysia mengambil tindakan segera semata-mata kerana kenyataan Jabatan Kehakiman AS ini? Adakah kemahuan Muhyiddin ini masuk akal dan mengikut lunas undang-undang?

Kes saman sivil Jabatan Kehakiman AS ini sama sekali berbeza dengan kes skandal banglo Lim Guan Eng, Ketua Menteri Pulau Pinang. Dalam kes Lim Guan Eng, terdapat bukti-bukti yang menunjukkan beliau terlibat dalam salah laku. Bukan sahaja siasatan telah dibuat malah Lim Guan Eng juga telah didakwa di mahkamah. Tidak pernah pula kita mendengar Muhyiddin bercakap mengenai hal yang lebih nyata seperti ini. Sikap 'double standard' dan berdendam Muhyiddin amat jelas dalam hal ini.

SWAY...Halie Loren



Laurel and Hardy

steadyaku47 comment : To those wonderful days when we were young....when we went over to my Uncle house to watch Buster Keaton, The Little Rascals and Laurel and Hardy Films...unforgetable days of much laughter and fun!


HADI WARNS AMERICA! Lagi satu Malaysia Boleh Kosong!



steadyaku47 comment : Masa saya kat London dalam tahun 60's....teringat saya camna orang putih kata "His bark is worse than his bite!"......saya share aja...teringat Indana Jones........orang macham Hadi ni orang Amerika tembak aja macham Indiana Jones tembak orang ni! Ptui!



AG Pandi a stupid Moron & Dumbo!


steadyaku47 comment : Saya nak marah Dato Thasleem panggil AG moron and Dumbo...tak hormat langsong Ag kita....tapi lepas baca apa Dato ni cakap...betul pulak! You are a stupid moron and a Dumbo Pandi!






Breaking news...1MDB

Received from a source. Latest development. To be verified. Tan sri shafie abdullah going to usa to negotiate. Massive campaign contribution to hillary (which will continue Obama agenda) in exchange for non prosecution. This was exactly how goldman sachs get away for fraud and market manipulation. Former AG Eric Holder was the money bag guy for obama. Will loretta lynch do the same for hillary. Minimum $500 million. Shafie departing soon. This must go viral to pre-empt attempt.

cakap cakap...CASH IS KING?


steadyaku47 comment : Engkau orang nak tengok how powerful Najib Razak is? How is this for starters...dia hantam AG Lynch first? And his "sahabat baik" is on his way to the US to discuss "donations" to any one else able to "assist" to selesai his "problem"......Malaysia Boleh!...saya steady aja.


 
By Jay Sekulow 
 
Attorney General Loretta Lynch must resign.

She has broken the sacred trust of the American people.

By meeting secretly with former President Bill Clinton – the husband of someone subject to an ongoing Department of Justice (DOJ) criminal investigation and a potential witness himself in that investigation – on a taxpayer-funded jet, she violated federal regulations and Department of Justice Standards of Conduct.

The virus of deception and unethical corruption has permeated the entire Obama Administration.

Members of Congress of both parties expressed dismay and dissatisfaction.

Although Attorney General Lynch described the meeting as “primarily social” discussing golf, grandchildren, and travels, the meeting is simply unacceptable.

Meeting with the husband of former Secretary of State Clinton while overseeing the investigation into her private e-mail server and possible civil and criminal violations dealing with mishandling classified emails violates numerous ethics rules.

5 C.F.R. § 2635.101(b)(8) states, “Employees shall act impartially and not give preferential treatment to any private organization or individual.

5 C.F.R. § 2635.101(b)(14) states, “Employees shall endeavor to avoid any actions creating the appearance that they are violating the law or the ethical standards set forth in this part.”
And finally, 28 C.F.R. § 45.2 is the regulation governing when a Department of Justice attorney must be disqualified from a criminal investigation because of a personal or political relationship. Under this rule, Attorney General Lynch is prohibited from participating in a criminal investigation or prosecution if she has a "personal or political relationship" with "[a]ny person or organization substantially involved in the conduct that is the subject of the investigation or prosecution," or any person or organization which she "knows has a specific and substantial interest that would be directly affected by the outcome of the investigation or prosecution."

It doesn’t get much clearer than that.

The Attorney General is required by DOJ ethics regulations to avoid even the “appearance” of impropriety.  Attorney General Lynch’s clear conflict of interest far exceeds this baseline ethical standard. 

Misconduct. Dishonesty. Impropriety. No matter what word you choose, Attorney General Lynch’s secret meeting with former President Bill Clinton was flat-out wrong.  She’s clearly disqualified from participating in the investigations into former Secretary of State Clinton’s private email server.

And she must resign.

I’m leading our senior litigation team preparing to file legal demands and ethics complaints.  If the DOJ doesn’t respond and she doesn’t resign, we’ll be back in federal court.  We’re already suing the State Department over its lies about the Iran deal. Join us in ending the Obama Administration’s virus of deception. If left unchecked, this virus is a threat to our democracy.

Reports that Attorney General Lynch will publicly state that she will accept the recommendation of the FBI and career prosecutors at the Justice Department does not change this fact. Promises do not undue conflicts of interest nor do they absolve ethical violations. It's not even an actual recusal from the case.

As our nation’s chief law enforcement officer and head of the Department of Justice, Attorney General Lynch, of all public officials, must remain above reproach. She has failed to do so. 

This decision to meet privately with former President Clinton while investigating his wife underscores a troubling and continuing pattern of bad judgment. She no longer has the trust of the American people. She should resign.

Sign our petition and join our fight for justice today.

Demand AG Lynch Resign Now

Executive Power109,969  Signatures

NATIONAL SECURITY ACT : No formal inquest into the death of anyone killed by army or police in any crackdown under its provisions!



Wake Up Malaysians! - Comment

22 Jul 2016

Ready to riot for Najib
Ready to riot for Najib

Najib has not hesitated to get his paid-up bullies in Red Shirts onto the streets to threaten ordinary folk, following the DOJ’s devastating details over his thefts from 1MDB.

But it’s next week that he plans to really take charge.

On 1st August his shocking National Security Act comes into force, designed to hand him dictatorial powers wherever he likes, against whom he likes for any six months at a time. 

Then he can renew those powers.

The bill was introduced without warning late on the final day of the Parliamentary session at the end of last year. Surprised MPs were given no time to scrutinise it, let alone put forward amendments and the debate was cursory as it was rushed through its stages in an effective pre-planned coup by the Prime Minister against his Parliament and the democratic rights of his own people.

Even the Sultans and the Agong have been shocked into a rare refusal to sign it unamended – but rather than accept their counsel on a matter of core national security he has brushed their concerns aside and forced it into law unchanged or re-considered.

That Najib’s excuse was the need to combat ISIS is no surprise.  Yet the terms of this Act would lead anyone to conclude that Malaysia has experienced worse threats than Europe, Indonesia and the US put together, which of course is not true.

None of those countries have attempted to create such sweeping powers to combat terrorists – the reason being that this law has nothing to do with fighting criminals… and everything to do with protecting the one who is presently in charge.
Is Najib Razak a safe pair of hands for such powers?
Is Najib Razak a safe pair of hands for such powers?

To give just a single example of the evil intent of this National Security Act, consider the clause that cancels the formal inquest into the death of anyone killed by army or police in any crackdown under its provisions.

Someone must have thought closely to insert such a sinister detail in advance.  That someone must have decided that they are tired of being inconvenienced by all the paraphernalia of the law when it comes to murder cases. That person wants to be freed from questioning and investigation, when someone who gets in his way is ordered dead.

Does Malaysia want to place such a dangerous law in the hands of a desperate thief and liar like Najib, who is furthermore himself personally associated with a string of murky, half-solved murders?

And yet, the mainstream press in Malaysia has been almost as silent on this deadly law, as over the shocking revelations by America’s Department of Justice about their Prime Minister’s thefts from 1MDB.  The story which has been headlines for the past two days in every other country in the world has remained virtually unreported where it is most relevant – Malaysia.

Core messages the Malaysian media are avoiding!
Core messages the Malaysian media are avoiding!

What press coverage there has been has even attempted to pretend that the description of Najib as ‘Malaysian Official 1′ means that he has somehow not been identified in the US indictment.  Do they think Malaysian’s are laughably stupid?

For the avoidance of doubt the PM is plainly and clearly identified in the United States Department of Justice indictment as the corrupt official who received $681 million in his private bank account direct from 1MDB (no Saudi Royals in sight).

The rest of the world media has had zero problem in making the connection, as evinced by the headline at the top of this article.  It is merely that legal documents only cite by name those who are directly moved against in that indictment – since Najib placed the US-based loot in the name of his step-son Riza and Jho Low (both now hiding in Malaysia and Taiwan) he was not directly relevant to that indictment.

However, his proven duplicity and shocking level of corruption is supremely relevant to people in Malaysia.

Malaysian media have tried to pretend otherwise
Malaysian media have tried to pretend otherwise

Frogs?

There is an over-used analogy, which explains a dangerous torpor, which could finally lose Malaysians their last vestiges of freedom, promising poverty and misery for their country.
A frog will jump out if you put it into hot water, but if you start from cold and heat it up, it stays and cooks.

After years of incremental abuses and ever-worsening corrupted practice, it seems Malaysians no longer understand a tipping-point or see the moment to act.

Revelations that mobilised Icelanders and even people in Brazil to successfully voice their outrage and to pressure the departure of discredited leaders, seem in danger of falling on deaf ears amongst self-defeatist Malaysians, who have perhaps bubbled in the pot too long?

It seems too many prefer to explain why ‘nothing can be done’, rather than take a risk and do it. This paralysis is worst amongst those with the most responsibility to take action now – those around Najib. Their failure to do the necessary is forcing others – ordinary people – to have to do their job of replacing a leader who has lost the plot.

Here we have one of the remaining countries in the world where sodomy remains a crime and was even used to place a popular opposition leader in jail on cooked-up charges. Yet, the population is being asked to nonetheless bend over and be thus abused.

How will once proud Malaysians be able to look other nations in the face if they let it happen and surrender up their freedoms to a thief, who has been exposed and discredited the world over for buying power with money stolen from the poor?